A US full-scale creative and design agency · Design agency · United States
Five years, three designers, no recruitment
A US design agency needed people who could execute their creative direction, not freelancers who needed managing. We moved three of our own core designers onto their team full-time.
- Engagement length
- 5+ yearsEngagement length
- Dedicated designers
- 3Dedicated designers
- Personnel changes in 5 years
- 1Personnel changes in 5 years
- Cost vs. three US hires
- 33%Cost vs. three US hires

At a glance
Engagement length — Since Q4 2020 — over five years
Dedicated designers — 3, full-time, from ACX's core creative team
Personnel changes in five years — 1
Monthly consumption — ~500 hours
Recruitment cycles run by the client — 0
Cost vs. three equivalent US hires — 33%
The client
A full-scale creative and design agency in the United States — brand, campaign and design work across the whole range rather than a single specialism. Strong creative direction, a clear house style, and more work than their studio could absorb.
The challenge
They didn't have a creative problem. They had an execution problem, which is a very different thing and much harder to buy your way out of.
The direction was set by senior people who were good at setting it. What they lacked was hands — designers who could take that direction and run it out across the volume a live account generates: the variants, the resizes, the adaptations, the second and third rounds. The unglamorous majority of design work.
They had tried the standard routes:
Freelancers. Available, but every project restarted the same conversation. Style re-explained, feedback re-given, brand rules re-taught. The management overhead consumed most of the capacity gained. And the good ones are never free when you need them, which is precisely when you're busiest.
Local hiring. Right in principle, unworkable in practice — months to hire, a competitive market, and once hired, a permanent cost regardless of next quarter's pipeline.
Overflow to other studios. Expensive, and it introduced a second creative opinion into work that needed one.
What they needed was a designer who behaves like an employee — knows the house style, sits in the same channels, takes direction the way a colleague does — without the client carrying the hiring, the employment, or the fixed cost.
Phase one: 50 hours, Q4 2020
The relationship began the way every ACX agency relationship begins: a 50-hour block. One month, minimum commitment, no restructuring required to find out whether it worked.
That entry point matters more than any argument we could have made in a pitch. An agency considering offshore design has usually been burned before, and what they want isn't reassurance — it's a cheap, reversible way to test the claim.
It worked, and it grew.
Phase two: three dedicated designers
As volume became predictable, hourly stopped being the right shape. Constant, high-volume design work with an accumulating body of house knowledge wants dedicated people, not a rotating pool of hours.
We didn't recruit them. We moved our own.
The three designers placed on this account came from ACX's existing core creative team — people already working to our standards, already inside our QA culture, already proven on other work. There was no hiring gamble, no months-long search, no onboarding a stranger and hoping. They then transitioned to the client full-time, dedicated entirely to this account.
That distinction is the whole difference between this and conventional offshore staffing. Most providers respond to a staffing request by opening a job ad — the client's risk is recruitment risk, dressed up as a service. Here, the client got three known quantities.
How it works day to day:
The three designers work full-time and exclusively for the agency
They're embedded in the client's own tools and rituals — their channels, their project management, their file structure, their stand-ups
Immersed in the house style: brand systems, templates, tone, and the unwritten rules every studio accumulates
They report directly to the client's creative lead, who assigns work, gives feedback and sets priorities exactly as with in-house staff
ACX remains the employer and the manager
What "managed by ACX" means in practice — this is the part clients get wrong when they hire offshore directly:
Guaranteed cover for leave, illness and holidays. The client's capacity doesn't vanish because someone is sick.
Performance managed on our side, to our standards, with the client's feedback as the input
Equipment, software licences, connectivity and a supervised office environment
All employment compliance carried by us
Replacement handled by us if a role ever needs to change — and because these came from our core team, any replacement is someone we already know
Phase three: the hybrid retainer
The design team solved the design problem. It also surfaced the next one: not everything the agency needed was design.
A client would approve a campaign and then need it animated. A brand refresh landed and the website needed rebuilding to match. Social assets needed producing on a schedule that had nothing to do with the project calendar. And sites built two years earlier still needed patching and looking after.
These are real needs, and none of them justifies a hire. Each is intermittent. Each needs a different specialist. Hiring an animator to work three days a month is absurd; going back to freelancers reintroduces exactly the problem the staffing solved.
So an Hourly Retainer was added alongside the staffing contract, drawing on ACX's wider specialist bench:
Social media design and production — volume work on a schedule
Motion graphics and animation — brought in when a campaign needs it
Website development — full builds when a brand engagement extends to web
Website maintenance — ongoing care for sites already delivered
The client's creative director briefs it the same way they brief the design team, and unused hours roll forward rather than expiring.
The result is one relationship covering two very different needs: fixed, dedicated capacity for the constant work; flexible, specialist capacity for everything else. Total consumption now runs at around 500 hours a month across both.
How we run it
The dedicated team works to the client's rhythm — their hours, their tools, their meetings, their priorities. Day to day, they are the client's designers.
The retainer runs through a named account coordinator who scopes each request, allocates the right specialist, and reports hours against tasks.
Two QA gates on retainer work. Each service line — design, animation, development — has its own QA officer reviewing against that department's standard, owned by the service-line head. Work then returns to the coordinator, whose check is deliberately different: not is this good? but is this what we told the client we were delivering? That second gate catches the most common failure in outsourced delivery — competent work that isn't the work somebody asked for.
Service levels on retainer requests. First-round delivery within 48–72 hours, with a benchmark of one or two minor revisions.
Communication. Everything runs through Dash, ACX's client management portal.
ACX oversight sits behind both. Regular check-ins on performance, welfare and workload — the employer conversation the client doesn't have to have.
Confidentiality. All work carries the agency's brand. Their clients see one studio.
Results
Longevity and continuity
Running since Q4 2020 — over five years, and still active
Three designers sourced from ACX's core team: known quality, no hiring risk
The same designers are still on the account. Across the whole engagement there has been a single change of personnel.
Zero capacity lost to leave or illness — cover is built into the model
That continuity point deserves more weight than it usually gets. The most common objection to offshore staffing isn't cost or quality — it's churn. We'll spend six months training someone and then they'll leave. Five years on the same account, with one change, is the only kind of answer to that objection that actually settles it.
Capacity
Three full-time designers added with no recruitment cycle run by the client
Grown from a 50-hour trial to around 500 hours a month — a tenfold increase
Four additional capabilities — social, animation, web development, maintenance — available on demand without four more hires
Cost
At around 500 hours a month, the agency's cost is approximately $7,500 a month — $90,000 a year.
Three US mid-level graphic designers cost approximately $22,750 a month — $273,000 a year, using a $70,001 median base loaded at 1.30× for employer taxes and benefits.
ACX hybrid, ~500 hrs/month — $90,000
Three US mid-level designers, loaded — $273,000
Difference — $183,000 — ACX is 33% of the cost
And that comparison is still too kind to the in-house option, because the ACX figure also covers motion graphics, website development and maintenance. Matching that in-house means an animator and a developer on top of the three designers — realistically another $200,000 a year, for capabilities used intermittently.
Loading multiplier of 1.30× is deliberately conservative — US Bureau of Labor Statistics data supports 1.43×. Excludes recruitment, equipment, software, HR administration and severance risk. Salary data November 2025.
What it unlocked
The agency's constraint moved. It used to be how much can our studio physically produce? It became how much can we sell? — a much better problem, and the one an agency owner would rather be solving.
Two specific consequences:
They stopped turning down or downscoping work. Large projects that would previously have been declined, or quietly trimmed to fit available hands, became deliverable.
They started selling services they couldn't previously deliver. Once animation and web development were reliably available, those stopped being things to refer out and became things to sell. Referring work to another studio doesn't just cost the margin; it introduces your client to someone else's account manager.
And the whole arrangement scales in either direction. Adding a fourth designer is a conversation, not a recruitment project. A quiet quarter draws down the retainer instead of carrying idle salaries.
The five-year point is the real proof. Anyone can make an offshore arrangement work for six months. This one has survived staff changes, market cycles and a pandemic, and grown tenfold from its starting block.
The engagement
Model — Staffing + Hourly Retainer
Started — Q4 2020 — as a 50-hour block
Now — Three full-time dedicated designers, ~500 hours per month total
Dedicated team — 3 designers from ACX's core creative team, client-directed, ACX-employed
Retainer covers — Social · animation · web development · maintenance
Delivery SLA — 48–72 hours, first round
Status — Active
Why this hybrid fit: constant, high-volume design work justifies dedicated people. Intermittent specialist work doesn't. Running both under one relationship gives the agency a stable core and a flexible edge, with one point of contact for both.
Want numbers like these?
Tell us where you are and we’ll map the fastest way there — no obligation.
More proof
All case studies →
A US full-scale digital marketing agency
We built their delivery team. Then we handed it over.
7 service lines covered

A US WordPress design and development agency
50 hours became one part-timer, then a team
5+ years engagement length

A US full-service digital agency
The agency that stopped hiring to keep up
100 retainer clients supported